Streamline your interview process
- Umay
- Apr 12
- 3 min read
Building a great company starts with the people, yet too often companies struggle to recruit strong, long-lasting talent. When we look introspectively,“what can we do better?”, very few have spent the time on hiring process’, committed energy to aligning questions and qualities, or ensuring interview panels are well coordinated. This guide is created to go deep in to the art and science of hiring for long-term success.
Define the job role and requirements
Review similar roles to ensure job title and criteria alignment
Determine the balance between required experience and transferable skills
Broaden the talent pool by removing experience-based requirements to avoid limiting qualified candidates
Source and identify potential candidates
Use LinkedIn queries to find ideal candidates based on key criteria
Share 3-5 sample profiles with recruiters and provide clear reasoning behind each selection - this helps standardize screening criteria and aligns expectations for candidate sourcing
Develop an interview and scoring guide
Create a structured interview guide that includes:
Key competencies needed for success in the role
Specific, non-generic questions to elicit meaningful responses
Consistent scoring system to evaluate candidates
Equip recruiters with 1-2 primary focus areas for initial screening
Ensure all interview guides include evaluation criteria for:
Cultural fit and work environment compatibility
Natural curiosity and problem-solving skills
Prepare the interview panel
Select 3-4 individuals to participate in every interview to maintain consistency
Review the interview and scoring guide with panelists and key stakeholders to establish clear expectations and ensure alignment
Assign each panelist 1-2 focus areas to ensure an in-depth evaluation within a 30 minute interview
Keep interview panels to a manageable size to streamline the process, scheduling and prevent unnecessary delays
Standardize scoring
Ensure all panelists score candidates consistently
If discrepancies arise in ratings, discuss the reasoning to determine whether it aligns with the role’s needs or if biases are influencing the decision
Post-hire review
When an employee leaves, review the original interview guide to assess:
Were any key indicators missed?
What adjustments can be made to improve future hiring decisions?
A real framework to leverage: Sales Development interview guide
One of the most frequent hiring challenges the BOSS Team faces is interviewing Sales Development Representatives (SDRs), or Business Development Representatives (BDRs). Unlike most SaaS roles, candidates often come straight out of school, have little professional experience, or are transitioning from entirely different industries - therefore the usual hiring playbook doesn’t always apply.
While hiring at Zuora, I noticed a recurring theme: when we sent account executives to interview SDRs, they often returned with feedback like, “Yeah, they seem nice, not a ton of experience. I’d have a beer with them”. That struck me as odd because, frankly, I’d have a beer with just about anyone… probably twice.
This observation led to a more structured hiring approach, focusing on intangibles like resilience, curiosity and adaptability - all are qualities that actually matter in an SDR role. Over time, this not only improved hiring outcomes but also built a more inclusive interview process, enabling me to build some of the most diverse teams in SaaS across multiple companies.
Many hiring managers believe they have a strong “gut instinct” for hiring, however if that were true, attrition rates would not be so high. Too often hiring decisions are based on personal impressions instead of the qualities that drive success in the role.
A structured process, with consistent, well-thought-out questions, keeps things fair, reduces bias and focuses on real potential, not just experience. If interviewers disagree on a candidate, we pause and revisit the interview guide. And if just one panelist says “no”, we pass. A bad hire doesn’t just hurt productivity - it wastes time, frustrates teams, and leads to a poor experience for the candidate. Both sides deserve the right match.


Comments